"The greatest popular
spectacles in America are elitist to the core: football games, baseball games, basketball,
professional tennis. But nobody is going to pay to watch Hilton Kramer and me swim the
800-meter freestyle in 35 minutes flat, despite our privileged position as not-quite-dead
white European males. [S]port...is an area in which elitism can display itself at a
negligible cost in social harm."Robert Hughes, The Culture of
Complaint Except among the Keanu Reeves crowd, the
meaning of "radical" is commonly understoodextremist, dismissive of how
things work in the workaday world and favoring change that borders on the fantastical. In
todays etymology lesson, however, we learn that "radical" stems from the
Latin word for "root"; it originally had connotations of returning to basic
principles. By definition, a radical is interested not in pie in the sky, but in ground
truths.
The word "elite" has suffered much the same
transmogrification. R.W. Apple, Jr. recently wrote in the New York Times, "
Elite is one of the dirtiest words in the lexicon of American politics, and
those who are suspected of having a mansion instead of a log cabin lurking in their
backgrounds feel the need to hide it with ostentatious symbols of the common touch."
Apples observation extends beyond politics. Dan Quayle caught flak for dissing
Murphy Brown, but his denouncement in that infamous speech of a "cultural elite"
struck a nerve that still twinges. You know who hes talking aboutthose
PBS-watching, syrah-sipping, out-of-touchniks who regularly gather in faculty lounges and
newsrooms to plan flag burnings. In nearly all of American society, to be called an
elitist is meant as a put-down. Its an accusation of snobbery, a charge that your
ivory-tower preoccupations blind you to the everyday struggles of the silent majority.
Thats definitely the case in running. These days, pretty much
anyone who can break 6:00 for a mile is wrongly called an elite runner. Theres a
certain misplaced awe in the naming: "Must be nice," people will say as you pass
them on the trail, as if youre not bound by the same laws of gravity and inertia
that they are. More predominant in the classification, though, is the opinion that faster
runners are utterly contemptuous of all who cant keep pace. With their focus on
fleetness, its said, elitists disregard the motives and accomplishments of the great
mass of todays runners.
Well, as that elitist-cum-faux-populist Richard Nixon would put it,
let me say this about that: Im sorry, but I missed the part where appreciating the
efforts of those who do a difficult thing well makes one disdainful toward others who try
but fall short of perfection. My dad is a jazz aficionado. His knowledge is vast and his
standards are high. But that doesnt mean that he didnt attend every single
squawking concert when I was in the school band. Nor does it mean that art critics
dont put their kids finger paintings on the refrigerator, or that literature
professors dont cherish mushy love letters. Properly understood, being an elitist
means having a broad, meritocracy-based appreciation of a given discipline that demands
bringing different expectations to different expressions.
Where is the evidence that those of us who crave reports of Haile
Gebresilasies latest Herculean labors spend our time telling slower runners not to
bother? After a race, the top finishers often head back to the course to cool down as
others are in their last miles. In two decades of doing this, Ive never seen someone
cooling down say to someone still racing, "You suck. Go home." Instead, in
nearly every such case, the faster runners cheer the slower ones, with those well-meant
claims of "Looking good" and "Its not far now" that we, too,
dont believe for one second when were racing.
At the 1993 Marine Corps Marathon, my then-girlfriend completed her
first 26.2-miler in about 4:30. I cried as she finished; this was a tremendous
accomplishment for someone with little athletic background, a busy job and a pell-mell
approach to training. But I didnt equate her run with that of the womens race
winner, who had finished 100 minutes before. I knew that, in the months before the race,
the winner had devoted hundreds more hours to the days cause than had my girlfriend.
It was my elitism, not schizophrenia, that allowed me to appreciate her run while
celebrating my girlfriends.
After all, just like everybody else, elitists have to put up with
bonehead bosses, sick kids and nasty weather. Were all too well aware of the
innumerable intrusions that get in the way of our miles; we feel fortunate, not holier
than thou, when we overcome them. In our sometimes-maddeningly objective sport, I
dont think myself to be anything special, not only because I have to work very hard
even to be as mediocre as I am, but also because I know that, right now, someone is
training at my race pace. All that being the case, my fascination with worldbeaters does
nothing to lessen my empathy for the jogger down the street. If anything, the two
complement one another, so that I see all runners as necessary ingredients in a rich stew.
What a radical notion.